Digital Movie Downloads

Digital video downloads have been the flavor of the week for a while now, but things are really heating up now. Youtube is the company to beat these days on the Internet. Grouper, a competitor, sold for $65 million recently to Sony. Even Microsoft is jumping into the act. Google Video has been selling TV Shows for as little as $1.99 each for a while now, but no one to date had really sold feature length Hollywood movies on the Internet in an organized fashion. Until a couple of days ago. Amazon.com, of all the people, launched a new website which enables digital movie downloads. Called Unbox.com, Amazon has pretty much scooped Apple on this one. And I’m sure it hurts.
Its pretty obvious that Apple has been working on a movie download store for a while now. Makes sense if they’re going to introduce large screen, video capable iPods soon (as the rumour goes). They’ve been working with major studios and I’m sure Job’s & Co. have been milking his Disney connections for all they’re worth.

But here’s something curious. Disney is the only major studio that hasn’t signed up with Amazon yet. And apparently, Disney is the only major studio Apple has signed up to date for their own store. Something is rotten in California. Should Apple be panicking now that Unbox.com has launched? How much value does Amazon scooping Apple really have?

Apple’s greatest advantage is iTunes. That is the reason why the iPod took off like nobody’s business. Allowing common folk download legal digital music quickly and simply sparked the iPod generation (Napster was great for techies and college kids, but most folks didn’t have the time or the willingness to use it).

But now the iPod is pretty ubiquitous, including the Video capable model. Any iPod Apple launches with large screen movie support is sure to be a success. So Apple has time on it’s hands to negotiate with the major studios to secure better pricing for us, which is the most probable reason for this delay. Luckily, Amazon doesn’t have the hardware to support their store just yet. End game: Consumer wins(cheaper pricing hopefully)!

This is a good time to talk about the flat pricing iTunes has for its music store, which is what Apple wants for its movie store as well. Frankly, it just doesn’t make sense to me on the face of it. Why should more popular music (or movies) cost the same as less popular stuff? Instead, let a free market be created for digital media. Who knows, new bands (or indie movies) might even profit by undercutting better known ones on price and get heard. Better yet, let users participate in a real time auction for digital media online, with Apple (or anyone else) only releasing certain number of licenses per track/movie per day. Result: You might have to pay $10 for the best song off the new Black Eyed Pea’s album but might just pick up a B-side no one really wants for very, very little. This model could definitely work very well with respect to optimizing revenue for the music industry, especially if only applied to new music, say all tracks released in the last 6 months (After which they are all sold at a flat rate).

Disclaimer: Yes, this model would definitely be againt artistic principal (Yadayadayada), but really, if your band is worried solely about their art, they should be on eMusic, instead of hiding behind Apple’s DRM.

Add comment September 11, 2006

Crocs (& Recommended Books)

The Crocs Craze (Video)

*You will need IE and Windows to watch

Crocs have quickly risen to become an international phenomenon. This summer, I’ve seen these shoes being sold in the grandest of malls in Singapore (retailing at $50 Sing.), sports shops and even in large bins in Thailand ($3, although, I’m pretty sure those were just Chinese knock-offs).

Although at first they seem to be like one of those things that come out of nowhere (and disappear just as quickly, can anyone honestly recommend a buy on that stock just yet?). But if you have a look at the video, they’ve been around for a while (since 2003 at least). Just goes to show that even overnight success needs years of planning :-) .

The other thing this reminds me off is Malcolm Gladwell’s book, The Tipping Point. Just how and when do localized fads become national and international crazes? Mr. Gladwell tackles these questions (and others pertaining to the Science of Fads) in an interesting way in his book.

The knock-offs I saw in Thailand warrant a whole post for themselves. Just another small example of how China is changing the world. Could the factory that produces real Crocs also be running a small, covert third shift to make a little money on the side? If they are, then what I really want to know is how much does Crocs (the company) pay for these shoes (which retail for $50)? Do they really pay low enough to warrant a third shift making shoes selling for $3? Those knock-offs were pretty darn good. Of course, might not be the same factory at all, but someone who managed to get hold of their designs. Anything’s possible, as I have been reading in China, Inc., a fascinating account of the rise of China as an economic, business and social superpower. Again, a great read.

But really, I would think the smart thing for Crocs to do would be to make sure that everyone can afford these shoes and owns a pair, rather than making them planned purchases. Make sure they’re on every feet and they might retain long-term, loyal customers who genuinely like the shoes (not just for the hip-appeal). Fads come and go. Will people still be wearing something so distinctive (read: ugly) long after everyone else has stopped wearing them, just because they weigh six ounces? The strategy should be to embed these shoes as socially acceptable in minds of people world-wide. They really need to be planning ahead, rather than trying to milk this for every penny they can here and now, especially now that Crocs is a listed company.

Just my 2 cents.

1 comment September 11, 2006

Opportunity Meeting Execution

My brother, golf nut that he is, sent me this video from the 2005 US Open (16th hole, I believe). Amazing shot.


Holistically, golf is a lot like business. A lot of time is spent talking, walking, trying and thinking. But then there are moments, very rarely, when opportunity meets execution so perfectly, it operatic. Those are the moments that are worth savoring and remembering.

This shot itself is one such moment for Nike. Every penny spent on endorsing Tiger (or rather, every million) was worth it many many times over when that ball rolled to a halt right next to the hole. Stayed there, Nike Swoosh upright, for a good 2 – 3 seconds, before dropping into the hole. You can not manufacture that on TV. You can not generate that on a computer. Nikes decision (execution) to endorse Tiger was worth it many times over with just this one shot (opportunity). Although, it did help that Tiger is so damn good.

Add comment September 9, 2006

Top 10 Best Presentations Ever

Wow. Mostly good list of the best presentations ever given. Notice how none of them consist of a guy talking in monotone to a Powerpoint slide. The presentation slide was invented to be a lubricant for presentations, not the presentation itself.

There’s some interesting stuff in here. Most of these have a business edge, but there are some classics like Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream”. Invaluable advise for all entrepreneurs who double as chief evangelists for their products.

Top Ten Best Presentations Ever.
With links to watch the videos. Fun fun fun!

Add comment September 9, 2006

The Holy Grail

Knights had their swords, horses and armour. The business person (and sometimes, the connected student) only has his mobile phone, more often than not while on the road. Hence, it makes perfect sense to invest in a great mobile phone which can do much more than merely make calls.

I have used a lot of smart/PDA Phones, but the holy grail has always been finding one with the right size, weight, functionality and features, all in one package. And now, dear reader, I think I’ve found it. But first, some history.

My O2 XDA IIs was too clunky, but the screen was incredible.

XDAIIS

The Nokia 9300 lacked WIFI (although the 9300i incorporates that), a touchscreen and looked really, very old (almost enough to qualify as retro).

nokia-9300-1.jpg

The O2 Atom doesn’t have a Qwerty keyboard

o2atom.jpg

Most phones from Dopod, O2, HP, Nokia (Communicator series) and Sony (the P9xx series) are either too thick or they lack a feature I need desperately (mostly, WIFI or a QWERTY keyboard get the axe).

Introducing the Champion:

nokia_e61.jpg

image-nokia_e61.jpg

The Nokia E61 (click for review) has it all. WIFI, check. Thinness? Comparable to the RAZR. Screen? brighter than most. QWERTY? fully. Blackberry? Yes.

From Wikipedia:

Manufacturer Nokia
Type smartphone
Connectivity WWAN quad-band GSM, UMTS/EDGE/GPRS/HSCSD/CSDWLAN Wi-Fi 54 Mb/s 802.11gPAN Bluetooth 1.2 (723.1 kb/s); infrared and full-speed USB
Retail Availability from 2006
Operating System S60 platform third edition on Symbian OS
Media MP3/AAC
Input 46 keys QWERTY thumb keyboard, five-way joystick
Power 1,500mAh lithium-polymer battery, 5.7V 800mA power supply
Memory 64MB miniSD card
Display Landscape QVGA 320 × 240 LCD screen 24 bits (16 million) colors

Of course, there is always a trade off. Nokia dumped the camera, but really, a good compromise to keep the profile so thin and yet feature rich. I must also commend the excellent build quality. Doesn’t come with a dock though :( And finally, a half-baked, over-hyped pretender:

moto_q.jpg

image-motorola_q.png

The RAZR was great, a true engineering and design marvel. The Moto Q doesn’t cut it for me. No WIFI, bad bluetooth implementation, slow roll-out and way too much hype. In my opinion, Motorola dropped by the ball by promising too much (albeit, implicitly) and delivering too little, too late. Goes to show that the tenets of old business still matter in new business.

I am generally discussing the GSM versions of these phones.

Add comment September 9, 2006

The Ubuntu-Girlfriend Experiment

 

ub_11.png

 

I should start this blog off with a confession. I haven’t really used Linux too much. But I am sort-of fimilar and Ubuntu has been my favorite flavor of Linux in the brief periods I’ve used it, for the Bohemic spirit it embodies if nothing. The reason I haven’t had the opportunity to explore Linux is because I have way too many gadgets, the drivers/software for which is usually unavailable for Linux (examples being my Bluetooth mouse, Canon Printer, etc.)

Enter Rubab. Her computer fritzed out again under the load of assorted malware. Again. This happening for the 3rd time this year, I thought she might be open to coersio.. er, accepting Linux on her desktop. I also wanted to test out whether Ubuntu could walk the walk (it can certainly talk the talk, with countless amateur evangelists preaching its gospel of ease of use everyday on Digg and other tech sites). But could a general computer user with absolutely no knowledge (or interest) in things technical be comfortable with Ubuntu right out of the box? Could it be a suitable replacement to Windows in the long run?

All of that happened a week ago. I started Rubab off by installing the latest Ubuntu version (6.06) for her. I left her Windows installation intact, just in case. I also installed multimedia support, updated her kernel and did all the messy crap you need to do with Linux to make it work well after installation (the reason being, Linux is free and mostly doesn’t come with support for patented file formats, like MP3 or DVD, which cost money. Support for these has to be obtained from other, more murky, means. Shhhhhhh.) Now we were set.

The first problem she faced was with her Printer. Predicable. Her Canon laser printer, LBP3200, was not really compatible with Linux. I solved this by checking out the Ubuntu Forums for a solution. Luckily someone had written a script that . Unluckily, it took 30 minutes and much muddling with the terminal and kernel to install. But I finally got it to work. But goes to show, if you are just a regular user, it might not be worth your time using Linux just to save a few $$ on Windows. On a side note, the Ubuntu Forums is really the reason why, I believe, Ubuntu is the best free Linux distro out there (well, that and the fact that they send you free CD’s with their software). The community is very responsive to newbies and almost every question someone might face when starting out, from the obvious to the obscure, is answered in detail, with comprehensive steps, when required.

Her actual experience with Linux has been quite sweet. Its fast. Looks nice (especially because I changed the annoying, depressing default brown color scheme to a much nicer Suse green). And it doesn’t crash. Music organization is much better, with Amarok running rings around Windows Media Player and even iTunes (IMO, Apple fanboys, please take a seat).

Meanwhile, her printer is giving her problems. While it prints at 18 ppm on Windows, Ubuntu barely gives out 4 pages per minute. That’s unacceptable, but it’s where that stands for now. Everything else, Wifi, LAN, power management, support for USB storage devices, etc. is working just dandy.

Some software related hiccups: streaming video doesn’t seem to work as well as it should. Some software, especially stuff she uses for her Engineering course at NUS, doesn’t have Linux replacements. But this is understandable and even excusable in my opinion. Good thing I left the Windows intact :)

End result: Linux is a great product on its own. Much superior to Windows. But no piece of software is an island today. Work needs to be done on making devices work out of the box and on device drivers. Device makers will not add linux support until it’s more widespread and it wont really become widespread until such support is available. Chicken and Egg.

Sadly, the anti-MS flame does not burn strongly enough for most people to endure the pain of switching to Linux. Until Linux requires a smaller time investment to get up and running properly, it can hardly challenge MS as a viable option for most people. But anyways, kudo’s to the Linux developer community for creating a great piece of software.

A note on adopting Linux for the general user: There are many companies out there, including Mandriva, Linspire and Xandros (really boys, if you’re going to hit end customers, get a better name), which sell Linux versions which can take out much of the pain from installing and configuring Linux. While this might be a good option for some, its not really in keeping with the free (as in beer water) software philosophy completely. But pragmatically, if I had to advice a total newbie to install and use Linux, it would be one of these options. If you have a geek knowledgeable person who has your back, then stick with OpenSuse or Ubuntu.

12 comments September 9, 2006

Next Posts


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

mjejhanrure on The Ubuntu-Girlfriend Exp…
vqapzolryn on The Ubuntu-Girlfriend Exp…
eldoruzihj on The Ubuntu-Girlfriend Exp…
Dan on 5 Reasons Why the Microsoft Zu…
bill on 5 Reasons Why the Microsoft Zu…